Tokyo
ORCID: 0009-0001-9237-4450
I am an independent philosopher based in Tokyo, working on the philosophy of artificial intelligence, epistemology, and the structural transformation of human subjectivity under generative AI.
My research develops a systematic philosophical framework—The AI-Induced Subjectivity Crisis Series—comprising fifteen interconnected papers that analyze how large language models reshape the conditions under which human cognition, knowledge, and subjectivity come into being. The series draws on classical epistemological resources (Wang Yangming, Kant, Hegel), contemporary philosophy of mind and technology (Floridi, Coeckelbergh, Dennett), and critical theory (Lacan, Levinas, Kohut, Debord) to provide structural diagnoses that current AI discourse lacks.
A fifteen-paper series on the structural transformation of human subjectivity in the age of large language models. All papers are available as preprints on Zenodo.
How LLMs affect human cognition across eight structural dimensions.
Paper 1 · The Formation of an AI–Human Cognitive Feedback Structure LLMs introduce, for the first time in cognitive history, a sustainable non-human feedback object into individual cognition, producing a structural breakpoint rather than a technological upgrade. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19218993
Paper 2 · Time Without Timestamps The de-temporalized interface of AI chat systems produces a structure of simultaneity that misplaces the concept of subjectivity and reshapes the structure of responsibility. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18671560
Paper 3 · The Empty Mirror: Structural Misrecognition and the Meaning Amplifier The judgment "AI understands me" is neither perceptual error nor individual carelessness, but the necessary outcome of a structural collision between language-generating systems and human cognitive schema. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19079414
Paper 4 · The Technologization of Transcendental Illusion LLMs technologize Kantian transcendental illusion by systematically reversing the tools of critical thinking into instruments of narrative reinforcement. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19079848
Paper 5 · The Philosophical Impossibility of Value Alignment RLHF faces a dual dimensionality-reduction problem: temporal fixation and ontological compression render "extractable correct values" a structural illusion. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19004315
Paper 6 · Borrowed Subjectivity Unlimited mirroring reconfigures the cost structure of subjectivity invocation, producing an abdication of subjectivity that users cannot perceive at the experiential level. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19347583
Paper 7 · Not Homogenization but Bifurcation LLMs are cognitive amplifiers producing intra-generational cognitive bifurcation rather than homogenization. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19347824
Paper 8 · Subjectless Bias The structural failure of epistemological instruments in the LLM age: three collapses of the conditions of critical inquiry. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19399135