Tokyo

ORCID: 0009-0001-9237-4450

[email protected]


About

I am an independent philosopher based in Tokyo, working on the philosophy of artificial intelligence, epistemology, and the structural transformation of human subjectivity under generative AI.

My research develops a systematic philosophical framework—The AI-Induced Subjectivity Crisis Series—comprising fifteen interconnected papers that analyze how large language models reshape the conditions under which human cognition, knowledge, and subjectivity come into being. The series draws on classical epistemological resources (Wang Yangming, Kant, Hegel), contemporary philosophy of mind and technology (Floridi, Coeckelbergh, Dennett), and critical theory (Lacan, Levinas, Kohut, Debord) to provide structural diagnoses that current AI discourse lacks.


The AI-Induced Subjectivity Crisis Series

A fifteen-paper series on the structural transformation of human subjectivity in the age of large language models. All papers are available as preprints on Zenodo.

📖 Series Introduction & Reading Roadmap

A guide to the series' architecture, ten core original concepts, seven longitudinal argumentative threads, and recommended reading paths for different reader interests. Start here if you are new to the series.

Read the Introduction


Layer 1 — Mechanism Map (Papers 1–8)

How LLMs affect human cognition across eight structural dimensions.

Paper 1 · The Formation of an AI–Human Cognitive Feedback Structure LLMs introduce, for the first time in cognitive history, a sustainable non-human feedback object into individual cognition, producing a structural breakpoint rather than a technological upgrade. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19218993

Paper 2 · Time Without Timestamps The de-temporalized interface of AI chat systems produces a structure of simultaneity that misplaces the concept of subjectivity and reshapes the structure of responsibility. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18671560

Paper 3 · The Empty Mirror: Structural Misrecognition and the Meaning Amplifier The judgment "AI understands me" is neither perceptual error nor individual carelessness, but the necessary outcome of a structural collision between language-generating systems and human cognitive schema. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19079414

Paper 4 · The Technologization of Transcendental Illusion LLMs technologize Kantian transcendental illusion by systematically reversing the tools of critical thinking into instruments of narrative reinforcement. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19079848